AI has made a big splash in many fields lately, including talent acquisition. Smart algorithms are changing how we hire, from sorting resumes to managing applicant data. Some firms even use AI for first-round interviews. But like any new tech, AI in recruiting has its ups and downs. Let's take a closer look.

Man holding a laptop case/bag standing on a train platform.
Man holding a laptop case/bag standing on a train platform.

AI in recruiting: the pros

automating time-consuming tasks

One of the main benefits of AI is its ability to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately. This means that repetitive tasks such as resume screening can be automated. The same goes for other time-consuming duties such as scheduling interviews and answering common applicant questions. For recruiters, this leaves more time for high-level tasks that require a human touch, such as strategy, relationship building and making complex hiring decisions.

enhancing your candidate experience

If you’re a large organization, you’re likely to receive thousands of job applications for a single position. AI can provide instant feedback and updates to this large number of potential candidates, keeping them informed and engaged throughout your recruitment process. AI tools can also process applications and communicate with candidates outside of traditional business hours, potentially enhancing your geographical reach as an employer.

making data-driven decisions

Properly designed, AI tools can help identify top talent for your company based on predefined criteria, skills, experience and even cultural fit, improving the accuracy of finding you the best-matched new hires. AI also ensures high consistency by applying the same parameters and guidelines when evaluating candidates. And by focusing on objective data rather than subjective impressions, it can help to reduce recruitment bias based on name, gender or ethnicity.

AI in recruiting: the cons

perpetuating unconscious bias

However, bias in AI recruiting is a double-edged sword. Standardized AI tools like ChatGPT learn from past data, so there's a risk that human biases might carry over or even get worse with AI. How do you fight this? One way is to use diverse and unbiased training data. But this isn't always easy. Many companies don't have direct control over the training data used by the AI tools they buy. They need to work closely with AI vendors to understand and influence the data that shapes these systems.

To counter bias, it's essential to:

  • audit AI systems regularly for fairness
  • use diverse teams to develop and test AI tools
  • combine AI insights with human judgment
  • stay up-to-date on best practices in ethical AI

missing out on nuanced or creative thinking

Relying solely on AI in recruiting, particularly for tasks that require candidate interaction, can make the process feel impersonal. This doesn’t just alienate potential candidates who value human interaction and communication. It can also mean missing out on creative solutions to a recruitment problem, such as candidates with unconventional career paths who don’t fit the mould and are therefore overlooked by AI algorithms.

creating issues of compliance and accountability

The tech is moving faster than legislation can keep up. Using AI in recruiting means that your organization may need to navigate complex legal and ethical AI-related issues—from compliance with employment laws and regulations to ensuring fair and ethical treatment of all candidates. For example, letting AI make recruiting decisions may lead to accountability concerns if it is unclear why specific candidates are selected or rejected.

addressing the challenges of using AI in recruiting

Many potential pitfalls of AI recruitment systems can be countered simply by not forgetting that they are tools — and still need people to oversee their use and always question if what is being done makes sense. By having AI support rather than replace decision-making, you can tap into its benefits while maintaining that crucial human element in your hiring process.